lohud.com

Sponsored by:

Inside Rockland

What's going on in your county

Archive for the 'Mirant' Category

Leg vs. Vanderhoef

May
14

The battle continues… Dum, dum DUM!

Okay, not it’s not that bad. But there has been a running theme this year of the Legislature complaining that County Executive C. Scott Vanderhoef has been less than forthcoming with information, something his office says just isn’t true.

Last month, at the April 30 Government Operations Committee meeting Legislator Ed Day, R-New City, asked Hospitals Commissioner Richard Maloney for a detailed breakdown of how much overtime pay is included in the department’s payroll figures.

At last night’s Multi-Services Committee meeting, Day again asked Maloney about the figures and Maloney replied that he’d gotten the numbers to the county executive’s office two days after the request was made.

So Day, visibly miffed, questioned Vanderhoef staffer Vince Altieri who told him he’d have to check and get back to him.

Other legislators, including Jay Hood Jr., D-Haverstraw, Philip Soskin, D-Monsey and Alden Wolfe, D-Suffern, said they were disappointed that the county’s administration had shared so little with them regarding the construction of the new hospital and nursing home. Soskin said he’s gotten most of his information about the project from media reports.

The Legislature, earlier this month, also accused Vanderhoef of not communicating effectively with them when his office requested approval for a $24 million bond related to the Mirant tax dispute.  Vanderhoef countered that the Legislature knew about the issue because it was discussed at a 2006 meeting.

C.J. Miller, spokeswoman for the county executive, said yesterday that claims the Legislature can’t get information on finances are bogus. The  Legislature’s fiscal analyst has access to the same numbers as the administration’s finance personnel.

“That information is open and accessible to everyone,” she said

As to the rest of the complaints, Miller said Vanderhoef’s office isn’t trying to hide anything or play games with the legislators.

“Maybe communication isn’t the problem here,” she said. “Maybe it’s a lack of understanding … a lack of comprehension.”

Posted by Sarah Netter on Wednesday, May 14th, 2008 at 5:07 pm |


Print Print | Email Email | Post a Comment »

Haverstraw village wants to condemn Mirant’s property!?

May
10

Town board and village board meetings can be amusing, but I would list the recent Haverstraw village board meeting as one of my favorites.


Straight-faced Mayor Francis “Budâ€? Wassmer, sitting in Village Hall’s meeting room Monday night, told the board members that he recently sent a letter to Mirant — the energy company that successfully challenged its property assessment and got $275 millions of refund from north Rockland’s towns, villages and school district — to notify that the village wants to buy the company’s property in the village for $100,000.


Why $100,000? His explanation continued.


For the village’s 2007-08 tax roll, the company once again filed a grievance, challenging the village’s assessment on the piece of company land, about $3.2 million. The company was asking the value be reduced to $100,000.


Outraged by this challenge, Wassmer said, he made the offer to buy it for $100,000.


Wassmer continued and said that the company sent him a reply, saying that the company was not interested in selling the property to the village at that price.


Learning about this exchange was pretty amusing.


But the climax was yet to come: After he finished reading Mirant’s replay, Wassmer made a motion to condemn that property!


“I’d like to recommend to our board that we pass the resolution tonight to proceed with a process of condemnation,� Wassmer declared. “I think it’s time that we send a clear message to Mirant. We must move forward with this.�


Village Attorney J. Nelson Hood immediately interrupted Wassmer, politely asking if he could advise the board.


Hood told the board that the village should first hire an eminent domain lawyer to review state law and that the village must have a public purpose to condemn the property.


Wassmer modified his motion based on Hood’s advice, and the village board unanimously approved it.


Also at the meeting was Bruce Kanner, co-owner of the old chair factory on the river who is fighting the village’s condemnation of that property.


Kanner told the board during the public input session that the village should stop trying to condemn privately owned land, including Mirant’s.


The village’s plan won’t move forward because the company dropped the assessment challenge based on the recent deal facilitated by state Attorney General Andrew Cuomo. But the deal only says the company can’t challenge its assessments for two years.


So, we’ll see. Check back in 2009.

Posted by Akiko Matsuda on Thursday, May 10th, 2007 at 6:52 pm |


Print Print | Email Email | 2 Comments »

Advertisement
About this blog
A team of reporters and editors in Rockland tell you what's going on at Town Hall, Village Hall and in your neighborhoods.

Subscribe
Rockland Week in Review Podcast

Get blog updates via email:

AddThis Feed Button




The Authors

Rockland Poll
Which park is your favorite spot to go leaf-peeping?
  • Add an Answer
View Results



Other recent entries


Rockland Week in Review Podcasts